I'm strongly contemplating a bit of a merger, though; some of the Version 2 dialogue is really good, and sets a stronger mood, especially Lumiar's responses. But there's a question that nags at my mind...
How much violence is too much? I rather like the way Blaid tears Lumiar apart in Version 2, but it may be excessive, and I know all too well that if I allow it, the carnage will run away with the story and it'll be a slasher flick.
So, in an informal poll of sorts, which is the better approach:
- A quick and brutal kill with only a modicum of blood and gore
- A long, drawn out kill where most of the gore is off-panel
- A quick and brutal kill that's layered in flying blood and organs
- Several panels of sheer carnage, with enough blood to paint a small house
Secondly, which kill works better? This is strictly opinion, but I trust the opinions of the masses here.
- Version 1: Lumiar is smashed into the pavement then impaled with a light post
- Version 2: Lumiar is beaten into a wall until his skull nearly shatters, then his arms are ripped off violently
- Unused: Lumiar is thrown into the air; Blaid uses a light post as a bat to knock him flying
- Unused: Lumiar is thrown like a human baseball; Blaid then hurls the light post after, impaling the priest through the head or chest and pinning him to a wall
That was a much longer post than I intended...
Did you bring the silver balls?
No Comments