So, since I botched simplicity, I'm going to try my hand at complexity and figuring out what role it should and shouldn't play in plot, character, setting and everything in between.

I'm starting again with Pixar. I'm watching Ratatouille now, and sure enough, it has the same sense of simplicity driving the plot as "Up!" But that doesn't mean that complexity is lost completely - watching Remy scurry about the kitchen like a furry Sam Fisher is an extremely complicated - and worthwhile - sequence.

But at the core, it's still the story about a rat who desperately dreams of being a Paris cook.

Compare this with the other movie I saw -- Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen. You've probably heard a lot about this movie in the last couple days. I'll try to sum it up as best I can.

It's long (150 minutes).

It's loud (It's directed by Michael Bay)

It's confusing (again, Michael Bay)

In spite of all of this, I really enjoyed the film. It wasn't a masterpiece by any means - the "critical praise" the TV spots show for Transformers 2 is kind of laughable how much it's been lampooned. And to be fair, it's filled to the brim with throwaway characters, unexplained mythos and plot holes so large they put the pot holes along my native Illinois roads to shame.

But I still found it entertaining. I still liked following the action. I still plan on buying the DVD.

This has lead me to re-think my conclusions on simplicity, because at the end of the day, both Transformers 2 and Ratatouille have the same goal to entertain.

Pretentiousness occurs when intent to entertain becomes insufficient. This isn't to say entertainment can't be multi-purposed. Some movies educate. Others satirize. And still others ponder. But when the aim of entertainment is seen as insufficient or entirely unnecessary, that's when pretentiousness sets in.

Pretensiousness is the deathblow - whether in works simple or complex.

PS - On a totally unrelated note, please check out my One Page Challege Pinch! I need some feedback!